Ok, we’ve all done it. When we lose a sale we say ‘Our product’s just too expensive”. We’ve criticized corporate branding, and we’ve complained about the product or service delivery. We’ve pointed to each of these, and others, as the reason why we’ve failed. And, let’s be honest – it’s not the reason, it’s an excuse.
I’ve held the view for a long time that if you lose a sale there are really only two reasons why that happen. Either you shouldn’t have been bidding for the business in the first place, because your product didn’t fit the needs of the target customer, or you’ve been outsold – simple as that. In the latter case – and this is sometimes hard to accept – if you lose a piece of business that you’re qualified to win, then you’ve been outsold. Your competitor has done a better job than you at articulating their value. You failed to show true difference, as opposed to mere positioned differentiation.
Or, in the case where the customer makes ‘No Decision’, then you’ve failed to describe to the customer why investing in your product is good for them. In effect you’ve been outsold by the customer’s inertia or anxiety.
As I said, this has been my view for a while, but courtesy of a recent webinar from the good guys over at Corporate Visions, there’s now the research to back this up. A recent study from the Corporate Executive Board demonstrates clearly that it’s primarily down to the sales person to demonstrate differentiation. So you can forget about blaming the product, the price, the implementation team – or any other reason. When you win – it’s because you did a good job. But when you lose it’s because you didn’t do so well.
In response to the question “How much impact do the following have on the customer’s decision to buy?”, here are the results from the Corporate Executive Board research. (Graphic courtesy of Corporate Visions).
You can see that, yes, it’s mainly about the performance of the sales person in the field. My question to you then is, “What are you doing about it? Are you following a sales process that maps your field interactions to the customer’s buying activities?
You control over half of the outcome. Get the right process in place and you can increase the positive impact of what you can control. In the end, it’s up to you to differentiate yourself, and leave the excuses to the competitors when they lose.











February 16th, 2010 at 12:31 pm
Social comments and analytics for this post…
This post was mentioned on Twitter by sales20network: New blog post: Differentiation: The key to sales success is you http://sales20network.com/blog/?p=366...
February 16th, 2010 at 4:09 pm
Hi Donal -
We agree wholeheartedly with your comment about differentiation – “it’s mainly about the performance of the sales person in the field.”
We believe that in addition to ensuring that the “sales process maps your field interactions to the customer’s buying activities” it’s also essential to look at improving sales performance by extending preparedness to the actual client interaction to achieve the intended sales outcome. This is essential to sales performance since these interactions represent your “moments of truth” to drive initial sales transactions and ongoing strategic customer relationships.
We describe this as “enabling great sales performances.” Given the many surveys about the criticality of the sales interaction, it’s ironic that there’s so much investment in creative efforts applied to web and social media based communications – not to mention the many years of creative campaigns with traditional media channels such as advertising and events – yet the appetite for applying this to communications delivered through sales is comparatively feeble.
Why is this important channel so underserved? We’ve just written a post, and have explored this and other best practices — on our blog http://www.ntarainteractive.com/fuse/
Thanks for the great (and timely) read!
February 17th, 2010 at 4:48 am
Thank you Thomas,
Whatever happens in product development, or marketing, unless the sales person can articulate the message, all other efforts are just so much busy work. All the message creation in the world is of little value unless it is linked, in context, to the sales process. In my opinion, it’s not just about re-factoring content, or re-purposing presentations, but it’s about smart application of the ‘tailored’ content for that specific customer. And of course, it’s also really about the preparedness of the sales person.