Maybe it’s the heat the of the summer, recession depression, or election fever, but for some reason it seems that some of our sales operations leaders are losing their way. Over the past few weeks I’ve seen some behavior that’s hard to fathom. Even George W. might find it incredible!
Exhibit 1: The sales operations leader of a Fortune 500 company (we’ll call it Company A) cast aside its account management program, and asked 1500 of its account managers to develop ‘account plans’ using a simple 10 page PowerPoint form to build its business plan for its next financial year. Simple is good – but this went to an extreme level. No training was provided on account management. There wasn’t any investigation of the business drivers at the target companies, competitive position, existing solutions at the customer, prevailing financial conditions or relationship with key influencers. The account managers were asked to just fill in a form to identify what solutions they had that had not been sold to the target customers. Then the 1500 PowerPoint forms were sent to one sales operation individual who keyed in all of the numbers into a spreadsheet, added up the numbers and secured resources based on this ‘business plan’. No validation of the ‘account plans’. No account strategy development. No customer perspective. With apologies to the Creationists out there, I think maybe Darwin might suggest that these folks don’t deserve to survive.
Exhibit 2: Company B, another Fortune 500 company, asked for a sales effectiveness program that would – and I quote – “improve the results without asking the sales team to do anything different.” Sad but true.
Exhibit 3: The sales operations and L&D team at Company C, yet another Fortune 500 company, wanted to implement a multi-million dollar sales effectiveness program, and wondered about the best way to get started. They felt that it might be difficult, given that the sales leadership didn’t believe in the program and would not support it. It’s not my place – but I’d probably recommend donating the money to charity.
There’s a saying in some companies that goes HR is too important to be left to the HR department. Well, if these three examples were generally representative of sales operations (and I don’t believe they are), then I think a similar adage would apply.
Two fundamental tenets of sales effectiveness of sales training are being overlooked in these examples. In the first instance, you only get back what you put in – and the sales team need to be involved, engaged, enthusiastic, and prepared to put in some effort to get some return. Secondly, because sales pervades all aspects of a company, without support of all stakeholders, a sales training or sales effectiveness initiative is likely to fail. These are just two of the key issues that need to be thought about – but maybe some general guidelines might help.
Going beyond the obvious, there are some principles that I believe merit consideration.
Based on our experience at The TAS Group from working with thousands of companies, when we look at the the efficacy of any sales effectiveness initiative, there are many ‘usual’ factors that combined determine the level of success or failure.
The most tangible elements are:
- Standard and quality of the content – methodology/process, delivery, and the supporting tools;
- Suitability and alignment of the content to your business, your culture and your existing systems; and
- Sustaining processes, procedures and tools to maintain consistent adoption, reinforcement and application.
In addition to this however, the more intangible elements are sometime more prominent determinants of success. Of these, Executive Sponsorship is the most frequently cited, and of course we understand and cater for this important element. Specifically however, regardless of content, context and culture, and even with the high-level Executive Sponsorship, there may yet be one missing ingredient.
Without the support of the sales organization, from the individual sales person to the regional and executive sales leadership, optimum performance / ROI will not be achieved. Working with your sales effectiveness provider, I’d suggest that you try to answer these questions?
- How do we together ensure that the sales organization will embrace this initiative with open arms?
- How do we entice (rather than enforce) involvement?
- How do we answer the ‘What’s in it for me?’ question for the sales person, sales manager or sales director?
- Can we together design the program, its components and (equally importantly) its presentation, in such a way as to build active excitement in the sales leadership, and
- Building on that momentum, how do we create a level of eager anticipation in the sales team?
– and then over-deliver on the actual learning, delivery and application experience to maximize the effectiveness of the program?
If you don’t consider every stakeholder’s perspective, seek out every different opinion, and gain commitment to the requisite behavior change (and pain that goes with that) success will elude you. You need to front-load the pain, do the planning, design and delivery work, and have both the courage of our convictions and the intestinal fortitude to see it through. The rewards can be tremendous – but it doesn’t come easily. Do it right – or don’t do it.










August 24th, 2008 at 11:03 am
Donal,
You’ve raise important points with respect to improving the return on investments in sales training.
I disagree with one point in your post, however. You said, “Well, if these three examples were generally representative of sales operations (and I don’t believe they are)…” Those examples *are* representative of sales operations. The research done by my firm, and those of (Sales20Network guest bloggers) Barry, Greg, and Joe bears this out.
For me all of this comes down to one thing: the sales ineffectiveness epidemic that afflicts many companies in most industries is the result of sales leaders–and the executives they report to–looking tactically at sales performance improvement (if at all), rather than strategically.
August 24th, 2008 at 12:28 pm
Dave,
Thanks for the comment.
I agree that the issues raised here are not limited to just the examples cited. However, I have also seen a number of implementations that are strategically considered, effectively implemented, and continuously reinforced – and I don’t think it would be fair to paint all with the same ‘tactical – not strategic’ brush.
Donal
August 25th, 2008 at 7:47 am
Donal and Dave,
This is a conversation that needs to take place. Thanks for getting it started. In my travels, here is what I have seen as possible root causes, by Exhibit example from above:
Exhibit #1- Fatigue. Many organizations have invested heavliy over the years in account management programs and no one took the time to capture success and/or failure. Therefore, why continue to spend money and time on an activity that cannot be tied to either? The easy way out is to just roll up some data into a presentation to get the boss off everyone’s back.
Exhibit #2- No priorities. This company, and so many like it, are reluctant to ask the field to engage in yet another sales improvement program. Why? Knee jerk reactionary programs in the past chasing sales problems not properly diagnosed resulted in a lot of work with no reward.
Exhibit #3- No business case. The reason the senior sales leadership team does not support programs run up the line by middle management is because there is no evidence the program will produce a real return. A proper business case, with hard numbers, is the quickest and easiest way to over come this obstacle.
Here’s the rub: Everyone knows this. Yet, only a few do something about it. Those that do have success. Those that don’t wonder why nothing seems to progress. It is the responsibility of those of us in the sales improvement industry to help these firms over come these issues. But, we share in the blame. All too often we see a sales person, representing a sales improvement product of some kind, slap a poorly constructed proposal together, and place it on the lap of a middle manager of a large company and hope they can piece it together from there. This usually does not work.
August 26th, 2008 at 4:22 pm
[...] TAS Group’s CEO, Donal Daly, wrote a post on The Sales 2.0 Network blog that provides examples of things companies do (in this case, three [...]